Breaking the Cycle: A Call for Authenticity and Collaboration in the Startup Ecosystem
A Call for Disruption
In a world where everyone seems to follow the same script, I believe it’s time to think differently, say the unsaid, and be brave. Today, I want to talk about something that many in the startup ecosystem shy away from: the inefficiencies and misaligned incentives within small and medium-sized venture capital (VC) funds and startup investors. It’s time to question the norms, challenge the status quo, and advocate for a more transparent, collaborative, and impactful approach to venture capital.
Defining Small and Medium-Sized Funds
Let’s start by defining what we mean by small and medium-sized funds on a global scale. Typically, these funds manage assets ranging from $10 million to $500 million. While they play a crucial role in the ecosystem by providing early-stage capital, many of these funds struggle with minimal human capital and resources to support startups beyond the initial investment. This limitation often means they can’t offer the strategic guidance, connections to potential clients, or the hands-on support startups need most to thrive.
The Misplaced Focus on Fundraising
One of the most troubling trends I’ve observed is the obsession with PR announcements about how much a startup has raised or how much a VC has invested.
We see headlines about the latest $10 million, $50 million, or $100 million rounds, but we rarely hear about how much the startup has grown since then. What value has been created? How many jobs have been generated? What impact has the company had on its industry or community?
This focus on raising capital rather than creating value is misleading and counterproductive. It feeds into a cycle where startups are pressured to raise more and more money, often at the expense of sustainable growth and long-term impact. It also creates an environment where VCs are more concerned with showing off their investments than supporting their startups.
The Importance of Advisory Support
Startups and VCs need to realize that seeking advisory support from seasoned institutions is okay. No one can do everything independently, and the idea that they should is unrealistic and detrimental. Advisory firms, particularly those with deep experience in specific sectors or markets, can provide the strategic guidance, market insights, and connections crucial for scaling a business. Yet, there’s often a reluctance to engage these experts, driven by the mistaken belief that it’s a sign of weakness.
This needs to change. Advisory support should be considered an integral part of the growth strategy, not a last resort.
By leveraging advisors' expertise, startups can navigate challenges more effectively, make better decisions, and ultimately create more value for their investors and themselves.
Breaking the Cycle: Moving Beyond Short-Term Gains
We must address the uncomfortable truth that a significant number of accredited investors, particularly in emerging markets, are driven primarily by tax incentives rather than a genuine commitment to fostering innovation. Governments in both emerging and developed markets encourage startup investments by offering substantial tax deductions to accredited investors—individuals who meet specific income and net worth criteria. For instance, in the United States, to qualify as an accredited investor, one must have a net worth exceeding $1 million (excluding the primary residence) or an income over $200,000 annually for the past two years, with expectations of the same in the current year. This model is widely adopted globally but varies in specifics depending on the country(SEC.gov, Kingscrowd).
While these tax incentives are excellent for encouraging startup investments, we need to question how many of these investments are made with a sincere intention to create lasting, positive change. Instead of competing to see who can raise the most capital or secure the largest tax deductions, it’s crucial to focus on how both capital and founders can be directed toward creating a sustainable impact on society and the planet.
Moreover, large industrial companies often receive grants and low-interest loans when they establish research and development centers. These incentives are designed to drive innovation and economic development. For example, in the U.S., companies involved in specific sectors like manufacturing or technology can access various tax exemptions, including those for machinery purchases or property taxes, to support their R&D efforts(Tax Policy Center).
While these initiatives effectively promote startup and innovation investment, we must critically assess whether the primary motivation behind these investments is to drive genuine global impact or capitalize on financial benefits. The challenge lies in shifting the narrative from short-term economic gains to long-term societal benefits, ensuring that investments are scalable, socially responsible, environmentally sustainable, and genuinely innovative.
The Power of Transparency and Collaboration
Finally, I want to invite everyone in the startup ecosystem to be more transparent and collaborative. This is not a race to see which funder performs better; it’s about how startups can improve to elevate the economy in their local and global markets. It’s about creating an ecosystem where every stakeholder—whether local or international, from developed or emerging markets—can contribute to and benefit from the growth of innovative, responsible businesses.
A Call to Action
It’s time for a new narrative in the startup world that values growth over fundraising, impact over optics, and collaboration over competition.
I challenge VCs, startup founders, and everyone involved in this ecosystem to break the cycle of short-term thinking and embrace a more sustainable, transparent, and impactful approach to building businesses. Let’s leverage capital in the most productive way possible and, in doing so, create lasting value for our economy, society, and planet.
Supporting Facts & Suggestions:
Human Capital in Small Funds: A study by Preqin in 2023 revealed that small and medium-sized funds, on average, have a team of fewer than ten professionals, often leading to overstretched resources and limited capacity to support portfolio companies effectively.
PR vs. Growth: According to PitchBook, more than 60% of startups that raised Series A in 2021 have not shown significant revenue growth two years later, highlighting the disconnect between fundraising success and actual business growth.
Tax-Driven Investments: Research by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) indicates that tax incentives are a significant driver for startup corporate investments, but these investments often lack long-term commitment.
Advisory Support: McKinsey’s 2023 report on startup ecosystems shows that startups receiving regular advisory support are 2.5 times more likely to scale successfully compared to those that don’t.
Impact Investment: Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) reported that impact investments have grown to $1.2 trillion in 2023, reflecting a shift towards investments that prioritize social and environmental impact alongside financial returns.
Comments